Thank you for more comments. @Nepali Blogger: I beg to differ they look good say ok but only look good from the outside from the inside they seem hollow. Ok about the content if you see Cybersansar there is nothing to read as such except of photos. If you call that good content then no problem. NTC has nothing cool than the websms which goes defunct time and again. Well I can go on hehe :-).
@Subi: Well getting 0 errors in XHTML and CSS is very had for the demanding designs. There are very few percent sites in the world in that category but switching to tableless layout is the key (Tabluar data should be presented in tables no problem but layout should be as per standard i.e, XHTML/CSS). Yes Nepali web audience just see "glamorous" pictures and other things, reading seems a thing of the past.
If a CMS is employed the web admin's life will be simplified a lot. So why not CMS and frameworks?
We are not bragging about XHTML, I'm behind some sites using Drupal CMS so when we plan the layout its the same problem table may be a easier and multi-browser compliant solution but it eats bandwidth like anything and other problems are attached too. If the world class CMS follow XHTML then they do it for good I guess. Why not XHTML???
Hope we see new sites in XHTML and old legacy sites transforming into it if its feasible for the creators.
Thank you for more
Thank you for more comments.
@Nepali Blogger: I beg to differ they look good say ok but only look good from the outside from the inside they seem hollow. Ok about the content if you see Cybersansar there is nothing to read as such except of photos. If you call that good content then no problem. NTC has nothing cool than the websms which goes defunct time and again. Well I can go on hehe :-).
@Subi: Well getting 0 errors in XHTML and CSS is very had for the demanding designs. There are very few percent sites in the world in that category but switching to tableless layout is the key (Tabluar data should be presented in tables no problem but layout should be as per standard i.e, XHTML/CSS).
Yes Nepali web audience just see "glamorous" pictures and other things, reading seems a thing of the past.
If a CMS is employed the web admin's life will be simplified a lot. So why not CMS and frameworks?
We are not bragging about XHTML, I'm behind some sites using Drupal CMS so when we plan the layout its the same problem table may be a easier and multi-browser compliant solution but it eats bandwidth like anything and other problems are attached too. If the world class CMS follow XHTML then they do it for good I guess. Why not XHTML???
Hope we see new sites in XHTML and old legacy sites transforming into it if its feasible for the creators.